Header Image - Gluten Light

luciano

Fodmaps (Fermentable, Oligo-, Di-, Mono-saccharides And Polyols)

by luciano

Negli anni, sono emerse numerose evidenze che l’ingestione di certi carboidrati a catena corta, includenti lattosio, fruttosio e sorbitolo, fruttani e galatto oligosaccaridi, induce i sintomi tipici della Sindrome dell’intestino irritabile.
Un metodo per ridurre la quantità di FODMAP e possibilmente la bioattività delle ATI nel pane (e quindi teoricamente migliorarne la tollerabilità), è l’utilizzo di processi di fermentazione prolungati nel processo di panificazione. La fermentazione a lievitazione naturale (pasta acida) attiva alcuni enzimi proteolitici e fruttosidasi nell’impasto e può quindi ridurre la quantità di proteine ​​e fruttani nei prodotti finali [14,15,16,17]. Il contenuto FODMAP del pane a lievitazione naturale può essere ridotto fino al 90% utilizzando uno specifico sistema a lievitazione naturale, come dimostrato nel nostro studio precedente [16]. Presi insieme, la cottura a lievitazione naturale potrebbe teoricamente dare prodotti con una migliore tollerabilità gastrointestinale.
(Pilot Study: Comparison of Sourdough Wheat Bread and Yeast-Fermented Wheat Bread in Individuals with Wheat Sensitivity and Irritable Bowel Syndrome Reijo Laatikainen et altri. Published: 4 November 2017.) Nota: I riferimenti presenti nel testo si riferiscono alla bibliografia dello studio citato.
Il lievito, d’altra parte, produce enzimi di inulina e invertasi che lavorano insieme per idrolizzare efficacemente i fruttani (Nilsson e altri 1987). La fermentazione con S. cerevisiae per 1,7 ore ha ridotto il contenuto di fruttani di grano integrale e farina bianca rispettivamente del 33% e del 48% (Knez e altri 2014). (A Grounded Guide to Gluten: How Modern Genotypes and Processing Impact Wheat Sensitivity – Chapter Fermentation and microbial enzymes – Lisa Kissing Kucek, Lynn D. Veenstra, Plaimein Amnuaycheewa, and Mark E. Sorrells. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety Vol. 14, 2015)

La riscoperta della coltivazione del grano più antico: il grano monococco (chiamato anche farro monococco o piccolo farro).

by luciano

Una descrizione molto approfondita sulla coltivazione del monococco, varietà Monlis, Hammurabi e ID331, la troviamo in un’interessante tesi di Laurea. Lorenzo Moi nel 2013 sotto la supervisione del CREA ha seguito ad Orosei Sardegna, tutte le fasi di semina, coltura, raccolto e trasformazione di queste varietà che sono state oggetto anche di moltissime analisi riguardanti le varie fasi di lavorazione. (UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PADOVA DIPARTIMENTO DI AGRONOMIA, ANIMALI, ALIMENTI, RISORSE NATURALI E AMBIENTE Corso di laurea magistrale in Scienze e Tecnologie agrarie. IL FRUMENTO MONOCOCCO (Triticum monococcum L. ssp. monococcum) IN SARDEGNA: CARATTERISTICHE AGRONOMICHE, REOLOGICHE, TECNOLOGICHE E POSSIBILITÀ DI SVILUPPO
Relatore
Prof. ssa Margherita Lucchin Correlatori
Dott. Norberto Pogna Dott.ssa Laura Gazza Laureando Lorenzo Moi).
Lorenzo Moi, Padovano, si è dedicato alla riscoperta dei grani antichi con passione, determinazione e competenza rari che lo hanno portato anno dopo anno ad ottenere prodotti unici per caratteristiche organolettiche e salutistiche preservando nel contempo la biodiversità dell’ambiente.
“Quando nel 2016 sono rientrato in Sardegna ho deciso che quella della coltivazione e trasformazione del grano diventasse la mia attività principale – racconta Lorenzo Moi –. Abbiamo iniziato a piccoli passi e ora abbiamo un’estensione di circa 15 ettari, che contiamo di triplicare nei prossimi anni. Per ora vendiamo solo ai privati, ma ci stiamo organizzando per aprire uno spaccio nel nostro mulino di Orosei. Vendiamo farina, pane carasau e vari tipi di pasta fresca, dalla fregula ai malloreddus». Il marchio che sta cominciando a cavalcare anche l’onda lunga del commercio elettronico si chiama “I grani di Atlantide” e richiama il mito ma anche il concetto di terra fertile. Un grano che punta sul suo alto contenuto proteico e che previene la celiachia: come testimoniano le relazioni degli Istituti di Gastroenterologia dell’università di Brescia e Federico II di Napoli.”

Farina di farro Dicocco e di farro Spelta

by luciano

Premessa: la ricerca ha evidenziato l’importanza della pasta madre realizzata con LAB selezionati e con quelli autoctoni delle farine di farro dicocco e spelta per sfruttare completamente il potenziale di questi “grani antichi”. L’optimum sarà, quindi, partire da una pasta madre con una selezione di lattobacilli (LAB) e rinfrescarla con le farine in oggetto apportando, così, il contributo del Lab presenti nelle stesse farine.

“Lactobacillus brevis 20S, Weissella confusa 24S and Lact. plantarum 31S were used as pool 1 to start spelt flour. Lactobacillus plantarum 6E, Lact. plantarum 10E and W. confusa 12E were used as pool 2 to start emmer flour. ‘Ancient grains’ could serve as an abundant source of protein and soluble fibre, oleic acid and macro- and micro-elements (Bonafaccia et al. 2000; Ruibal-Mendieta et al. 2005). In spite of this increasing interest, few results are available on the microbiota of spelt and emmer and on their suitability for bread making. Selection of starters within endogenous strains was considered the most important pre-requisite. Some recent studies (Di Cagno et al. 2008a,b,c) on fermented vegetable foods, which also included strains of Lact. plantarum, have clearly shown that endogenous strains are preferred to those of the same species isolated from different matrices to promote a rapid and intense process of acidification with a positive influence on nutritional and technological properties. To use, mixed starters was considered functional to completely exploit the potential of spelt and emmer flours. Mixture of strains with dif- ferent carbohydrate metabolism is frequently used because it may guarantee optimal acidification and sensory properties (Gobbetti 1998). Mixed obligate and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria starters, as selected in pool 1 and 2, ensured rapid growth and acidification, the capacity to liberate FAA and exploited the rheology, sensory and nutritional properties of the raw flours. This was according to a two-step fermentation process. The use of sourdough comprising selected and autochthonous strains of lactic acid bacteria was considered the most suitable biotechnology to exploit the potential of spelt and emmer flour in bread making. Fermentation of spelt, emmer or wheat flours by pool 1 and 2 was allowed according to a two-step fermentation process (Fig. 1). As the general rule, it was possible to keep it lower than 4Æ0 in spelt and emmer sourdoughs, which implied a considerable synthesis of acetic acid (Gobbetti et al. 2005). Acidity of spelt and emmer breads was perceived through sensory analysis and positively influenced the volume and crumb grain of breads. Flavour of bread is known to be influenced by the combination of raw materials, fermentation and baking process (Gobbetti et al. 2005). Spelt and emmer sourdough breads received the highest score for acid taste, and a clear preference for the global taste was assigned to spelt sourdough bread. First, this study showed the suitability of spelt and emmer flours to be used for bread making according to a two-step fermentation process. Sourdough biotechnology based on selected starters was indispensable to completely exploit the potential of these ‘ancient grains’. Spelt and emmer flours were purchased from a local market. The characteristics of emmer flour were water content, 15,0%; protein (N · 5,70), 15,1% of dry matter (d.m.); fat, 2,5% of d.m.; ash, 1,9% of d.m.; and total soluble carbohydrates, 2,6% of d.m. The characteristics of spelt flour were water content, 15,0%; protein (N · 5,70), 19,1% of d.m.; fat, 2,2% of d.m.; ash, 2,0% of d.m.; and total soluble carbohydrates, 2,7% of d.m. Spelt and emmer flours: characterization of the lactic acid bacteria microbiota and selection of mixed starters for bread making. (
R. Coda, L. Nionelli, C.G. Rizzello, M. De Angelis, P. Tossut and M. Gobbetti. 1 Department of Plant Protection and Applied Microbiology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy 2 Puratos N. V., Industrialaan, 25 B-1702z, Groot-Bijgaarden, Belgium. 2009).”

Diversità genetica del grano

by luciano

A-B-D Genomes

Wheat occurs in a range of diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid forms (summarised in Table 1). The earliest cultivated forms were the A genome diploid einkorn (T. monococcum var monococcum) and tetraploid emmer (T. turgidum var. dicoccum) with the A and B genomes. These are closely related to wild forms: diploid T. monococcum var. monococcum and T. ururtu and tetraploid T. turgidum var. dicoccoides, respectively. Modern tetraploid durum (pasta) wheat (T. turgidum var. durum) probably arose from mutations in cultivated emmer.
Hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) (genomes ABD)
Hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) (genomes ABD) has never existed as a wild species and no wild hexaploid wheats are known. It probably arose by hybridization of cultivated emmer with the related wild grass T. tauschii (goat grass, also called Aegilops tauschii and Ae. squarossa). This hybridization probably occurred in south-eastern Turkey about 9000 years ago (Feldman, 1995, Dubcovsky and Dvorak, 2007) and contributed the D genome. All cultivated hexaploid wheats, including spelt, are forms of T. aestivum.
A major difference between “ancient” cultivated wheats (einkorn, emmer, spelt) and their wild relatives and modern durum and bread wheats is whether the grain are hulled or free threshing. In hulled wheats the glumes and palea adhere to the grain and the threshed material consists of intact spikelets.
α-gliadins
As the most coeliac-active T-cell epitopes are present on the α-gliadins, emphasis has been placed on exploring differences in the amounts and sequences of proteins of this class. Kasarda 
et al. (1976)
33mer fragment of α-gliadin
The studies of van Herpen et al. (2006) showed that T-cell stimulatory epitopes were more abundant in α-gliadins encoded by the D genome, and Molberg et al. (2005) who demonstrated that the immunodominant 33mer fragment of α-gliadin was encoded by chromosome 6D (and hence absent from diploid einkorn and tetraploid wheats).
The absence of the D genome from durum wheat
The absence of the D genome from durum wheat could result in lower coeliac activity due to the absence of the T-cell stimulatory epitopes at the Gli-D2 locus. van den Broeck et al. (2010a) therefore screened 103 accessions of tetraploid wheat by immunoblotting of gluten protein extracts with monoclonal antibodies against the Glia-α9 and Glia-α20 epitopes. This identified three accessions with significantly reduced levels of both epitopes. Further analysis of 61 durum wheat accessions by high throughput transcript sequencing similarly identified some accessions with lower abundances of transcripts containing coeliac disease epitopes (Salentjin et al., 2013).
Other gluten proteins
Although impressive progress has been made with identifying variation in the abundances of coeliac disease epitopes in α-gliadins, it must be borne in mind that other groups of gluten protein also contain coeliac active sequences. This was demonstrated in the survey of gluten protein sequences in the Uniprot protein sequence database by Spaenij-Dekking et al. (2005) which is referred to above. They showed that T-cell stimulatory epitopes were present in all γ-gliadin sequences (17/17), in 95.5% (21/22) of HMW subunit sequences and in 5% of LMW subunit sequences (3/57), in addition to 66% (19/29) of α-gliadin sequences. (Improving wheat to remove coeliac epitopes but retain functionality. Peter R. Shewry and Arthur S. Tatham 2016).