Grain Starch damaged 

by luciano

Grain Starch is composed of two substances:

  • amylopectin: is a branched-chain polysaccharide, can be composed of about 1 to 6000 molecules of glucose. It tends to be placed in the central part of starch granules and is not soluble in water. Generally it represents 80% of the total.
  • Amylose is instead a linear chain polysaccharide. It can contain up to 600 glucose molecules. Tend to be around 20% of the total. It melts at high temperatures and in water. These two constituents determine the differences between the starches, depending on their ramifications and degree of polymerization.

Starch represents 67-68% of whole wheat and between 78-82% of the flour produced by grinding. The semicrystalline structure of the starch granules is damaged by mechanical operations, in particular by the grinding process that shatters it. The level of damaged starch directly influences the water absorption and the mixing properties of the dough and therefore has a great technological importance. The damaged starch absorbs 2 to 4 times more water than normal starch granules. The crushed starch granules are subject to the action of alpha and beta amylase (1); the former transform starch into maltose and dextrins (2) and the latter transform it into maltose.

An excessive value of damaged starch involves a high water absorption, sticky dough, longer leavening times and dark color of the crust. A better knowledge of the levels of damaged starch in flour is essential for their best use. The optimal value of damaged starch varies with the use of flour and is highly dependent on the protein content of the flour, alpha-amylase activity and the type of bread desired. Starch is a polymer of glucose and comes in two different forms: amylose and amylopectin.

Amylose is a linear chain wrapped in a helix, in which the units are linked together with α (1 → 4) glucosidic bonds. Amylopectin is made up of a basic chain formed by glucose units linked to α (1 → 4), from which bound side branching α (1 → 6) starts. The action of alpha-amylase on starch can also be hindered by the presence of non-digestible polysaccharides, the fibers: cellulose, hemicellulose and pectin. The amylose chains, and to a lesser extent the branches of amylopectin, thanks to the formation of hydrogen bonds with neighboring molecules and within the molecules themselves, have a tendency to aggregate. For this reason pure amylose and amylopectin are scarcely soluble in water below 55 ° C, and more resistant to enzymatic digestion (resistant starch), that is difficult to attack by alpha-amylase. It should however be noted that the granules placed in aqueous solution hydrate, with a consequent increase in volume of about 10%. Above 55 ° C the partially crystalline structure is lost, the granules absorb further water, swell and move to a disorganized structure, that is to say the gelatinization with which the starch assumes an amorphous structure more easily attacked by the α- amylase.

In summary Amylases perform the following functions in bakery products:

  • Provide fermentable and reducing sugars.
  • Accelerate yeast fermentation and boost gassing for optimum dough expansion during proofing and baking
  • Intensify flavors and crust color by enhancing Maillard browning and caramelization reactions.
  • Reduce dough/batter viscosity during starch gelatinization in the oven.
  • Extend oven rise/spring and improve product volume.
  • Act as crumb softeners by inhibiting staling.
  • Modify dough handling properties by reducing stickiness.

Note

(1) Two amylases are common to the baking industry, α-amylase and β-amylase also known as α-1,4-glucan glucanohydrolase and α-1,4-glucan maltohydrolase. Amylases convert starch into sugar: the α-amylase will cleave the starch randomly (the so called 1-4 bonds in the starch) while the β-amylase can only chop off two sugar units at the time at the end of the starch chain. Normally there is enough β-amylase present in the flour but sometimes addition of α-amylase is needed. The α-amylase will cut the starch into smaller units called dextrins and the more α-amylase activity there is, the better for the β-amylase because there are more extremities available. So the substrate for the β-amylase is either starch or dextrins and the product is maltose. α-amylase is an endo-enzyme that attacks linkages within the molecular structure. It randomly cleaves starch chains at interior a-1,4-glycosidic linkages producing short chains of glucose molecules or dextrins. β-amylase is an exo-enzyme and cleaves maltose units from the non-reducing end of the starch molecule. In order for these enzymes to function, the starch granule must be ruptured so that the individual starch molecules are available for enzymatic action. Depending upon their origin, α- and β-amylases show differences in pH and temperature optima, thermostability, and other chemical stability. They do not require coenzymes for activity, although α-amylase activity is enhanced by the presence of calcium. The pH optimum for α-amylase is 4.5 and it is inactivated at a pH of 3.3 to 4.0. This pH dependence decreases the efficacy of this enzyme in sourdoughs. β-Amylase is active across a much broader pH range, 4.5-9.2, with a pH optimum of 5.3. α-Amylase is relatively thermostable up to 70°C, whereas β-amylase loses about half of its activity at this temperature. Fungal amylase is the least temperature stable, followed by cereal amylase, while bacterial amylase is stable at higher temperatures. New intermediate stability enzymes have been developed that are active above the gelatinisation temperature of starch (60°C), but are totally inactivated at the later stages of baking (80-90°C). The objective is to maximize the anti-staling effect without creating a gummy, sticky product. Bakery technology – Enzymes http://www.classofoods.com/page1_7.html

 

(2) “Amylase activity also leads to dextrins, which have an important effect on water-holding ability and porosity of the dough, as well as on bread softness, an excessive dextrin production is observed and sticky dough is obtained. The rheological properties of the dough are slightly modified by amylolytic consumption of damaged starch. Damaged starch has a large hydration capacity and its disappearance leads to a decreasing dough consistency. Consequently, although the production of oligosaccharides represents the positive aspect of amylolytic activity, the negative effect of damaged starch consumption on the rheological properties of dough should not be neglected. “ omissis “The more important factor in baking quality is the gluten characteristics of dough. Strong dough with an extensive gluten network is suitable for bread making [8]. In contrast, weak dough without an extensive gluten network is best for cookies and cakes [9]. For this reason the effect of damaged starch on flour quality is difficult to identify independently of protein influence, so we think that it is important to clarify damaged starch effects on baking quality limiting protein influence. “Influence of damaged starch on cookie and bread-making quality (vedi approfondimenti).

The temperature and pH optimum of α-amylase.

The temperature optimum of α-amylase was 40 – 50 °C in all sets of wheat (Figure 10a) and maize cultivars (Table 17). These values are comparable with that of cereal amylases (Mohamed et al. 2009; Al-Bar 2009; Nirmala and Muralikrishna 2003). …omissis…From technological point of view, enzyme’s temperature optimum considers an indicator for food processing application. In breadmaking, the temperature pattern during breadmaking process is divided into three stages (Drapron and Godon 1987): 1) dough- making, it includes mixing ingredients and fermentation. During this step the temperature does not exceed 25 °C. 2) Baking on the oven. Dough is subjected to a constantly increasing temperature from 25 °C up to a maximum of 100 °C. 3) Cooling and storage loaves, the bread is cooled to 25 °C. It is a common practice in breadmaking to use α-amylase from different sources as supplementation in flour to yiled fermentable sugars (Goesaert et al. 2005). Rosell et al. (2001) compared the temperature optimum of α-amylase from different origins (wheat, malted barley, fungi and bacteria) in order to optimize the use of α-amylase in flour standardization. They found that it is very difficult to satisfactorily control the level of bacterial α-amylase in bread making, because of its ability to survive at high temperatures found in the baking stage. On the other hand, cereal and fungal α-amylases had a different behavior. Fungal α-amylase is the most thermo labile, followed by those from cereal. …..omissis……The pH range of the maximal activity of α-amylase was within 4 and 6 in both wheat (Figure 10b) and maize (Table 17 and Figure 14b). Similar results have been reported for α- amylase from wheat (Mohamed et al. 2009), maize, sorghum, (Egwim and Oloyede 2006) and barley (Al-Bar 2009). From food technological point of view, the pH in most of food applications can not be readily adjusted to the pH optimum of α-amylase. Therefore, the origin of enzyme has to be chosen on the basis of its activity at the natural food pH (Curvelo et al. 2008; Cato 2005). For instance, natural pH of starch surry is general around 4.5 (Sivaramakrish 2006). Egwim and Oloyede (2006) tested the suitability of α-amylase from different sprouting Nigerian cereals (maize, acha, rice and sorghum) in starch hydrolysis processes based on the pH value. They found that the four cereals exhibited broad pH optima of α- amylase, ranging from 4 to 6, which was in agreement with the industrial practice. ……omissis….Sometimes the activity of α-amylase that presents naturally in flour is not suffient to produce good bread volume and quality. Therefore, flour is routinely supplemented with exogenous amylases to optimize the amylase activity. Commercial amylase can be obtained from fungal, cereal or bacterial sources (Goesaert et al. 2005). Studies carried out by Rosell et al. (2001) have tested the activity of amylase from those commercial sources with the process condition in breadmaking. They found that the pH optimum of cereal α-amylase at 4.5 – 6.0 was appropriate to use this source of enzyme in flour standardization. We may suggest using them as source of amylases in flour standardization for breadmaking owing to the broad optimum pH of their amylases. Characterization of α-amylase in wheat and maize. Dissertation
to obtain the Ph. D. degree
in the International Ph. D. Program for Agricultural Sciences in Göttingen (IPAG)
at the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany presented by Hanadi Riyad Aljabi born in Damascus, Syria Göttingen, May 2014.”

 Depeenings:

1 – Bakery technology – Enzymes

2 – Influence of damaged starch on cookie and bread-making quality.

3 – INFLUENCE OF AMYLASES ON THE RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF WHEAT FLOUR WITH PARTIALLY DAMAGED STARCH.

4 – The Effect Of Damaged Starch On The Quality Of Baked Good.