Header Image - Gluten Light

Daily Archives

4 Articles

Sugars and Proteins in Gastric Digestion

by luciano

 

A high intake of refined sugars, especially when highly concentrated or in liquid form, sometimes consumed together with protein-rich meals, may under certain conditions contribute to rapid gastric emptying. This condition often leads to diarrhea, nausea, and abdominal cramps. In addition, a high intake of sugars can alter the gut microbiota (dysbiosis) and, over time, compromise the intestinal barrier.

Rapid gastric emptying (Dumping):

Sugars and high–glycemic index foods can trigger a rapid emptying of gastric contents into the small intestine.

Impaired digestion:

Rapid transit prevents proper breakdown of food, allowing incompletely digested food and nutrients to reach the small intestine, with possible subsequent bacterial fermentation.

Alterations of the gut microbiota:

Excess sugar can modify the intestinal microbiome and damage the intestinal barrier.

Increase in inflammation:

The combination of undigested food, fermentation, and a compromised intestinal barrier can promote local and systemic inflammation.

Symptoms:
This process often manifests with diarrhea, discomfort, and bloating.

Properly managing nutrition by avoiding excessive gastric overload with high-sugar foods is essential for maintaining good digestive health.

Both proteins and sugars (especially at high concentrations) significantly slow gastric emptying, i.e., the process by which food leaves the stomach and enters the small intestine. Proteins are particularly effective in slowing this process, contributing to glycemic control and increased satiety.

Key Details on Gastric Emptying

Impact of proteins:

Proteins are known to slow gastric emptying, often by stimulating intestinal hormones such as CCK and GLP-1, which inhibit gastric motility.

Impact of sugars/carbohydrates:

High concentrations of sugar (glucose) are powerful in slowing gastric emptying, helping prevent rapid influxes of large volumes of content into the small intestine.

Meal combination:

Combining proteins and carbohydrates (as in the case of dessert) results in more stable and slower digestion compared to consuming sugar alone.

Mechanism:
The presence of nutrients (proteins, fats, and sugars) in the duodenum activates feedback mechanisms that signal the stomach to empty more slowly.

Therefore, the consumption of proteins or sugars (such as in dessert) induces the stomach to retain food longer, resulting in a more gradual release of glucose into the bloodstream.


The “Dessert Stomach” Phenomenon

The “dessert stomach” phenomenon—the feeling of being full but still having room for dessert—is determined by sensory-specific satiety (feeling full only for one type of food) and by a physiological relaxation reflex that creates space in the stomach. When the palate is tired of savory flavors, the brain seeks sugar to feel satisfied, allowing a small indulgent portion to appear as the perfect conclusion to the meal.

Main reasons for this sensation include:

Sensory-specific satiety:

One feels “full” of savory foods, but the sensory desire for sweet/fatty or energy-dense foods persists, allowing further eating.

Physical relaxation reflex:

Upon tasting sweet or pleasant foods, the brain signals stomach muscles to relax, literally creating space for dessert.

Brain reward circuits:

Sugar stimulates dopamine release, pushing the brain to override satiety signals in order to obtain gratification.

Delay in satiety signals:

Satiety hormones take 20–40 minutes to fully exert their effects. Dessert often arrives before the brain has completely registered that the main meal was sufficient.

Faster digestion:

Sugary foods often pass through the stomach faster than proteins or fats, making a small portion feel less “heavy” and more like a simple “filler.”

How to Interpret These Apparently Contradictory Statements

✅ 1. Under normal conditions: proteins and carbohydrates slow gastric emptying

This part is correct:

  • Proteins → stimulate intestinal hormones (CCK, GLP-1, PYY)

  • Carbohydrates → especially if complex or in moderate amounts

Result → the stomach slows emptying.

This is a physiological protective mechanism:

The stomach tries to avoid large amounts of nutrients arriving all at once in the small intestine.

Therefore:

  • Mixed meal (proteins + carbohydrates)

  • More gradual digestion

  • More stable blood glucose

  • Greater satiety

This is standard behavior in healthy individuals.

⚠️ 2. Under particular conditions: high-osmolarity sugars may favor rapid emptying

This part is correct.

Proteins stimulate intestinal hormones such as CCK, GLP-1, and PYY.
Carbohydrates—especially when complex and consumed in moderate amounts—also activate regulatory mechanisms that slow gastric emptying.

The result is a physiological protective response:
the stomach limits the speed at which nutrients are delivered to the small intestine in order to optimize digestion and absorption.

Therefore, a mixed meal containing proteins and carbohydrates typically leads to:

  • More gradual digestion

  • More stable blood glucose levels

  • Greater and longer-lasting satiety

This represents standard physiological behavior in healthy individuals.

gh-osmolarity sugars may favor dumping

The first statement refers to a pathological or para-physiological phenomenon, typical especially when:

  • Sugars are very concentrated

  • In liquid or semi-liquid form

  • In large quantities

  • Sometimes after gastric surgery

  • Or in individuals with intestinal sensitivity

Here the problem is not “sugar slows or accelerates,” but rather:

Highly concentrated sugar solutions create a strong osmotic gradient.

This can:

  • Partly override normal slowing mechanisms

  • Favor rapid passage of hyperosmolar contents into the intestine

The term “dumping” in this context is often used broadly, not always as the classic clinical dumping syndrome.

Fundamental Difference

Situation

Predominant Effect

Solid mixed meal, moderate quantities

Slowed emptying

Concentrated sugary beverage, large quantities

Possible rapid emptying

Sugar + fiber + fats + proteins

Slowing

Sugar alone in solution

Faster

Why Can Both Occur?

The stomach regulates emptying through two opposing forces:

  1. Hormonal signals → slow emptying

  2. Osmotic pressure and volume → can accelerate emptying

If osmotic load is extremely high, regulatory control can be partially bypassed.

Microbiota and Inflammation

There is no contradiction here:

Chronic high intake of simple sugars →

  • Favors dysbiosis

  • Increases fermentation

  • May alter the intestinal barrier

This can occur even if gastric emptying is slow.

They are independent processes.

Final Synthesis

✔️ It is true that proteins and carbohydrates normally slow gastric emptying
✔️ It is also true that highly concentrated sugars, especially liquids, may promote rapid passage
✔️ They are not mutually exclusive: they depend on context and food form

Short version: In a normal meal, proteins and carbohydrates slow emptying.
With large amounts of concentrated sugars (especially liquid), osmotic effects may favor rapid passage.
Both statements are therefore correct, but refer to different physiological scenarios.

Why Smaller, More Frequent Meals Work Better

by luciano

When you eat a very large meal, several things happen:

  • The stomach stretches significantly

  • Blood flow to the digestive system increases

  • A strong hormonal response is triggered (insulin, incretins, etc.)

This can lead to:

  • Sleepiness or drowsiness

  • Mental “fog”

  • A feeling of heaviness

Dividing total calorie intake into several moderate meals:

  • Reduces the digestive load of each single meal

  • Helps keep blood glucose more stable

  • Promotes more consistent energy throughout the day

Better several balanced meals than one very large one.

✅ “Finish eating and not feel your stomach”

This phrase describes an ideal state very well:

  • Not full

  • Not empty

  • No tension or weight

In practice: light satiety, not “fullness.”

A good indicator is stopping when you feel satisfied but could still eat a little more.

This approach:

  • Improves digestion

  • Reduces reflux and bloating

  • Supports mental focus

What causes post-meal “mental fog”

It often results from:

  • Excess calories

  • Too many simple sugars

  • Very high-fat meals

  • Heavy combinations

It’s not only about quantity, but also quality.

How to make a meal easier on the stomach

  • Moderate portions

  • Lean proteins

  • Complex carbohydrates

  • Cooked or raw vegetables in a tolerable amount

  • Chew slowly

  • Avoid large late-evening meals

⚠️ An important clarification

Eating more often does not mean eating continuously.

It’s better to think in terms of:

  • 3 main meals

  • 1–2 snacks (if needed)

The key point is: a manageable digestive load at each meal.

Difference Between Ancient and Modern Grains

by luciano

 

Science indicates that the real difference between ancient and modern wheat does not lie primarily in the total amount of protein, but rather in its quality and structural organization.

A – Scientific Evidence (CREA, University of Bologna, MDPI): Summary of Main Findings

1. Gluten Strength (W Value)

The most marked difference concerns rheological properties, meaning how dough behaves.

  • Modern Wheat:

  • Selected for strong gluten (high W, often between 200 and 400). This creates a tenacious and elastic gluten network, ideal for industrial baking and pasta-making.

  • Ancient Wheat:

  • Characterized by weak gluten (low W, often between 20 and 90). The gluten network is more fragile and less elastic, making mechanical processing more difficult but, according to some studies, making proteins more easily accessible to digestive enzymes.

2. Gliadin/Glutenin Ratio

Gluten consists mainly of two protein fractions:

  • Gliadins – responsible for extensibility and for celiac toxicity

  • Glutenins – responsible for elasticity and dough strength

MDPI research shows that ancient wheats (such as einkorn and spelt) often have a much higher gliadin/glutenin ratio than modern common wheat.

Consequence:
This explains why ancient-grain doughs are stickier and less capable of retaining fermentation gases, producing breads with lower volume.

3. Gluten Quantity and Toxicity

Contrary to popular belief, ancient grains do not necessarily contain less gluten.

  • Protein content:

  • Many ancient varieties contain higher protein levels (14–18%) than modern wheat (11–14%).

  • Celiac disease:

  • Studies from CREA and Fondazione Veronesi confirm that ancient grains contain the same toxic epitopes (and sometimes in greater quantity) as modern wheat. Therefore, they are not safe for people with celiac disease.

  • Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS):

  • Some research (e.g., Prof. Spisni, University of Bologna) suggests that the different gluten structure and the presence of other compounds (such as polyphenols) in ancient grains may reduce intestinal inflammation markers in non-celiac sensitive individuals.

Synthetic Comparison Table

Feature

Ancient Grains (e.g., Senatore Cappelli, Verna)

Modern Grains (e.g., Manitoba, Creso)

Gluten strength (W)

Low (20–90)

High (200–450)

Elasticity

Very low

Very high

Digestibility (non-celiac)

Potentially higher

Standard

Yield per hectare

Low

High

Plant height

Tall (>150 cm)

Short (60–80 cm)

B – Comparative Study on Gluten Protein Composition of Ancient and Modern Wheat Species

(Geisslitz et al., 2019 – Foods, MDPI)

Study Design

  • 300 cereal samples

  • 15 cultivars per species (einkorn, emmer, spelt, durum wheat, common wheat)

  • Grown in four locations to eliminate environmental variability

Key Findings

Quantity vs Quality

Ancient species show higher total protein and gluten content than modern common wheat.

Gliadin/Glutenin Ratio

Modern wheat contains much higher glutenin levels, responsible for dough strength.
Ancient species exhibit extremely high gliadin/glutenin ratios (up to 12:1 in einkorn vs <3.8:1 in modern wheat).

Technological Weakness

This produces weak gluten incapable of forming a strong network, resulting in lower bread volume but a simpler protein structure.

Conclusion
Modern breeding did not increase gluten quantity but profoundly changed its polymeric quality to enhance industrial performance.

C – Differential Physiological Responses to Ancient vs Modern Wheat (Spisni et al., 2019)

1. The Nutritional Paradox

From a biochemical standpoint, ancient and modern wheat are very similar in macro- and micronutrients.
However, human clinical responses differ markedly.

2. Inflammatory Response and Gluten Strength

  • Modern Gluten:

  • Highly polymerized, strong, and resistant to human digestive enzymes.

  • Ancient Gluten:

  • Structurally weaker and less polymerized, therefore more easily fragmented during digestion, reducing exposure to pro-inflammatory peptides.

3. Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Effects

Clinical trials show that replacing modern wheat with ancient wheat leads to:

  • Reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α)

  • Improved metabolic parameters (cholesterol, blood glucose)

4. Role of the Gut Microbiota

Ancient grains promote growth of beneficial bacteria producing short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) such as butyrate, which:

  • Strengthen the intestinal barrier

  • Reduce intestinal permeability (“leaky gut”)

5. Study Conclusions

Ancient grains are not suitable for celiac disease, but represent a superior choice for:

  • Non-celiac gluten sensitivity

  • Irritable bowel syndrome

  • Healthy individuals seeking to reduce baseline inflammation

Final Synthesis

The industrially desirable technological strength of modern wheat gluten appears to be the main factor placing stress on the digestive and immune systems.

Ancient grains do not contain less gluten—but their gluten is structurally simpler, less polymerized, and potentially more digestible, which may explain their better tolerance in many individuals.


Integrated Approach to Reducing Low-Grade Chronic Inflammation August 18, 2026 update

by luciano

This article is part of a three-part series:
1. Integrated approach to reducing low-grade chronic inflammation — the operational document: which behaviors and strategies to adopt.
2. Integrated approach to reducing low-grade chronic inflammation in light of 2026 scientific research — the scientific verification document: which elements of the Approach are supported by the most recent literature and with what degree of evidence.
3. Low-grade chronic inflammation: the topic in science communication in the international press in 2026 — the communication analysis document: how the topic is presented, interpreted, and communicated by the international scientific and general press

(Low-grade chronic inflammation is not a disease in the strict sense, but a persistent biological state that promotes the development of numerous chronic diseases. This document proposes an integrated approach aimed at modulating it through lifestyle.)

Furthermore:
In the absence of univocal and definitive solutions, the most rational strategy for reducing low-grade chronic inflammation consists of adopting a lifestyle that minimizes exposure to potentially pro-inflammatory factors* and promotes protective ones.

The importance of low-grade chronic inflammation.
Although intermittent increases in inflammation are essential for survival during physical injury and infection, recent research has revealed that certain social, environmental, and lifestyle factors can promote chronic systemic inflammation, particularly low-grade chronic inflammation (LGCI), which, in turn, can lead to several diseases that, taken together, represent the leading causes of disability and mortality worldwide, such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases. (see article: https://glutenlight.eu/2025/08/21/infiammazione-cronica-basso-grado/ [1]

This type of inflammation has multiple triggers:
Gut dysbiosis:
Alteration of the intestinal bacterial flora, which can be caused by an unbalanced diet, excessive use of antibiotics, or other toxic substances.
Poor diet:
Excessive consumption of processed foods, rich in refined sugars and saturated fats, which can promote inflammation. [11]
Stress: Chronic stress can negatively affect the immune system and increase susceptibility to inflammation. [3–5]
Environmental pollution and toxins:
Exposure to chemicals present in the environment or in food can contribute to oxidative stress and inflammation. [12]
Smoking and alcohol:
These factors can aggravate oxidative stress and damage cells, promoting inflammation. (see article: oxidative stress)
Drug use is not included among the triggers because drugs are considered always and in any case to be avoided.

Another consideration concerns the individual’s general state of health. In this document, the term “healthy” does not coincide solely with the absence of diagnosed diseases, trauma, wounds, or other events capable of activating acute inflammation. In a more rigorous physiological sense, an individual is considered truly healthy if they have no active disease and are not persistently in a state of low-grade chronic inflammation. This distinction is important because the absence of a formal diagnosis does not, by itself, demonstrate the absence of a persistent inflammatory state.
It is important to emphasize that, in the presence of acute inflammation, the biological markers used to assess low-grade chronic inflammation are elevated, making it difficult to distinguish the two phenomena and potentially masking any improvements in LGCI.

Having made these clarifications, we can begin the Integrated Approach
1️⃣ Stress management.
This is a very important factor given the emerging scientific evidence concerning the gut–brain axis, a bidirectional communication system through which psychological stress, emotions, and mental states influence intestinal motility, barrier permeability, and microbiota composition, and vice versa. Alterations in this axis can promote inflammation, digestive disorders, and metabolic imbalances. Stress should be managed independently using existing techniques or, if this is not possible, with the help of a psychologist. [3–5]
2️⃣ Environmental pollution (air, water, etc.): it goes without saying that the more we can avoid it, the better. This factor is relevant to oxidative stress. [12]
3️⃣ Nutrition: here we can do a great deal
Important point:
Nutrition must be closely related to age, activity level, eating habits, and general state of health.
Foods to avoid
1. Industrial foods: they may contain numerous additives. At authorized doses, occasional exposure to a single additive is generally considered low risk in the general population; greater caution may be reasonable when exposure is frequent, involves mixtures of several additives, or concerns individuals with specific vulnerabilities. Therefore, without turning every additive into a certain risk, it is advisable to favor minimally processed foods and reduce unnecessary overall exposure [A]. [2,11]
2. Industrial beverages: generally contain large amounts of sugars/sweeteners/additives.
Many gluten-free products, especially industrial ones, are highly processed and may contain numerous additives. This does not imply that such products are inherently pro-inflammatory, but, when there is no medical need to consume them, it may be prudent to limit their consumption and prefer naturally gluten-free or less processed foods, thereby reducing overall exposure to additives and refined ingredients. [11]
3. Foods to consume in moderation
4. Wine/beer: in moderation
5. Alcoholic beverages: occasionally (spirits: NO)
6. Coffee: in moderation
7. Processed meats: very moderately
8. Sweets: in moderation. If there are problems with sugars (because of weight or blood glucose), they should be consumed in appropriate amounts so as not to cause problems.
9. Cheese: very moderately and to the extent compatible with the individual (reduction/elimination if intolerant to lactose/casein protein; possible replacement with lactose-free products)
10. Spices: in moderation
11. Fats: fewer trans (hydrogenated) fats and, to a lesser extent, excess saturated fats; more extra-virgin olive oil (oleic acid)
12. Refined sugars: it is advisable to limit their intake, especially when they contribute to a caloric surplus, frequent glycemic excursions, or occur in a context of overweight, visceral adiposity, or insulin resistance. In these contexts, repeated glucose and insulin spikes may contribute to a metabolic environment more favorable to pro-inflammatory processes. [11]
12. Gluten: in moderation. If possible, whole-grain/semi-whole-grain pasta; bread: if possible, whole-grain durum wheat/spelt. Common wheat contains a component of gluten that is very difficult to digest (33mer). Given the relationship between gluten strength and digestibility, products made with grains that have less tenacious gluten should preferably be chosen. Among “ancient grains” there are several with this characteristic (in fact, even among modern grains there are cultivars with less tenacious gluten: they are used to make cakes but not bread): these should be preferred. Those who are gluten intolerant but not celiac, considering that this intolerance is “dose-dependent,” can, with the help of a physician, determine the threshold (amount) that does not cause problems. Grains with less tenacious gluten make it easier to consume products made from them. Further reading: Difference between ancient and modern grains (Published separately)
Foods to consume abundantly:
1. Fiber (compatibly with any intestinal problems): 3–4 times a day.
2. Fruit (compatibly with any problems involving sugars, blood glucose and/or weight).
3. Green tea: it can be a useful component of a balanced diet. It is rich in catechins, particularly EGCG, and several studies suggest possible favorable effects on oxidative stress, metabolism, and some inflammatory markers; however, the magnitude of the benefit in humans varies according to dose, duration of intake, and individual characteristics [D]. [19]
The essential contribution of water to maintaining proper hydration and normal physiological functions, including kidney function, circulation, and solute transport, should also be remembered. Significant dehydration can alter various metabolic and physiological processes. The lymphatic system performs an important function in draining interstitial fluids and participates in the transport of mediators and cells of the immune system; through these functions it contributes to maintaining tissue homeostasis and to the processes of regulation and resolution of inflammation.
It is therefore advisable to maintain hydration appropriate to individual needs, taking into account age, physical activity, environmental temperature, and any clinical conditions. See: The role of water in reducing low-grade inflammation
It should be emphasized, in summary, that the Mediterranean diet and, more generally, dietary patterns with anti-inflammatory characteristics have shown in numerous studies and meta-analyses a reduction in markers of low-grade chronic inflammation. For the Mediterranean diet, the most recent evidence documents, in particular, significant reductions in hs-CRP and IL-6 [8–10].
4️⃣ Eating behaviors
Nutrition rests on two main pillars: quantity and quality.
The amount of food consumed should be that required for physiological functions plus that needed for the activities performed. This simple principle would greatly help us maintain a correct and healthy weight. This is not an easy goal for two simple reasons: the first is “temptation,” the second is that the “full/satiated” mechanism is delayed relative to actual fullness, meaning that the sensation of satiety does not coincide with the actual filling of the stomach, but comes later. As early as 50 years ago, the family doctor advised getting up from the table with a slight desire for more food. Quality: it goes without saying that the more genuine and “clean” foods are (that is, free of toxic substances), the better.
What follows should also be considered a general framework because, as already stated, it must be “designed around the individual.”
A – Avoid as much as possible consuming too much food in a single meal
The stomach should be put in a position to work (digest) as well as possible. It is often preferable to eat several times rather than have a single very large meal. Ideally: finish eating and “not feel the stomach,” with the result of avoiding postprandial “mental fog.” Further reading: Why smaller, distributed meals work better. (Published separately)
Food that is not completely digested, in healthy people*, is subsequently processed in the intestine and then eliminated. However, if the gastrointestinal system is compromised or altered, the passage of inadequately digested substrates into the intestine can promote bacterial fermentation and be pro-inflammatory. (https://glutenlight.eu/2025/06/12/cibo-non-digerito-e-infiammazione-intestinale/)
Not only the stomach, but also and above all the intestine must be able to work at its best and continue digesting food so as to make it absorbable. [B] [C]
*Here the critical point is: does the truly healthy individual still exist?
B – Avoid mixing foods that are too different
The stomach works in an acidic environment, where pepsin digests proteins (which are further digested in the intestine by trypsin and other enzymes). Sugars begin digestion in the mouth (ptyalin) and are then digested mainly in the intestine (pancreatic amylase). Some clarifications are necessary here: [13–16]
Carbohydrates and proteins in the stomach generally do not create problems. A pasta first course followed by fish, meat, cheese and perhaps vegetables, in quantities suited to one’s digestive capacity, does not create problems.
If the second course is a very fatty food, it should be considered that gastric digestion slows and, depending on the amount, may slow gastric emptying, with the possible passage into the intestine of food that has not been completely digested. [13–16]
The situation is different if we include a portion of dessert in the meal.
Here we are dealing with a significant amount of simple sugars, not complex carbohydrates (pasta, for example, consists mainly of starch, and only part of it is converted into sugars already in the mouth; therefore, mainly starch reaches the stomach).
Sugars are not digested in the stomach except to a negligible extent:
“The stomach has a highly acidic environment that prevents fermentation there; the undigested sugars travel to the small intestine and large intestine, where they are fermented by the gut bacteria.”
Dessert at the end of a meal (meaning a moderate portion) does not cause problems in a healthy person (who is relatively rare today), but makes digestion less easy for many people, not only because of possible subsequent intestinal effects, but also because of the sensation of heaviness that may occur. [17,18]
It should be clarified that this is not a dogma: there are people who digest practically everything without difficulty — we are all different.
Age also plays a fundamental role. Older people tend to feel better the simpler the meal is. Further reading: Sugars and proteins in stomach digestion (Published separately)
Important point
In the case of diet-related diseases, intervention by a specialist (dietitian or nutritionist) is strictly necessary.
5️⃣ Specific behaviors:
Engage in physical activity, even if only moderate. [6,7]
If employed, avoid as far as possible allowing work to cause persistent stress. Chronic stress should in any case be managed because, through neuroendocrine and immune mechanisms and the gut–brain axis, it can contribute to maintaining a state of low-grade inflammation. [3–5]
In the presence of overweight, and especially excess visceral adiposity, it is advisable to agree with one’s physician or a specialist on a realistic pathway for weight reduction and improvement of body composition.
After working life, engage in activities that require concentration and, if possible, creativity. Carrying out projects is highly useful for keeping brain functions active
6️⃣ Assessments:
Together with one’s physician, define the routine general assessments necessary for good monitoring of one’s health, in addition to specific assessments for any diseases.
Final Summary:
We must build a personalized lifestyle model for reducing low-grade chronic inflammation.
In a healthy person, a meal containing proteins and sugars in moderate amounts does not cause problems. The combination becomes potentially problematic when sugars are highly concentrated, especially in liquid form and in large quantities. In people with a sensitive or altered gastrointestinal system, even moderate portions (such as a dessert at the end of a meal) can cause digestive discomfort.
The integrated approach to reducing low-grade chronic inflammation is based on the available scientific evidence, reported in the bibliography section. Since many studies show significant associations without demonstrating an absolute causal relationship, a precautionary principle should be adopted: reduce or eliminate, where possible, potentially harmful factors, favoring choices with low biological risk.
Final notes
Note [A]: Intestinal barrier and additives. In certain experimental or clinical contexts, some components of the Western diet — including excess saturated fat and salt, alcohol, and some additives in ultra-processed foods — have been associated with alterations in the intestinal barrier or microbiota. For gluten, effects on permeability are particularly relevant in celiac disease and in predisposed individuals and should not automatically be generalized to “healthy” people. It is therefore preferable to speak of factors that “may alter” the barrier, in relation to dose, duration of exposure, and individual vulnerability. Stress can also negatively affect the gastrointestinal barrier, including through the CRF–mast cell axis [2–5]
Protective effects on the barrier may instead be exerted by: caloric restriction or fasting, prebiotics, probiotics, butyrate (SCFA), vitamins D and A, flavonoids, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, zinc, mucoprotective agents (gelatin tannate and tyndallized probiotics)
Note [B]: Fermentation and gastric emptying. Prolonged retention of food in the stomach can generate fermentation, especially if food remains longer than normal because of slow digestion. This phenomenon can cause gas accumulation, bloating, abdominal tension, and belching. Causes may include both slow gastric emptying and the consumption of certain foods. [13–16]
How symptoms present
Bloating and abdominal tension: Fermentation produces gas that can accumulate, causing a sensation of fullness and distension.
Frequent belching: Excess gas can be expelled through belching.
Flatulence: Gas can also be released as flatulence.
Feeling of fullness: Even after eating little, one may feel satiated.
Common causes of slow digestion
Large meals or meals eaten too quickly: Chewing too little and swallowing quickly can slow the digestive process.
Poor diet: A diet rich in sugars and carbohydrates can promote fermentation.
Diseases or disorders: Some medical conditions can slow gastric emptying.
Note [C]: Symptoms of poor digestion. A sandwich gulped down quickly and poorly chewed in the rush of a lunch break that is too short or spent on the phone; one bite too many so as not to leave that excellent baked pasta because “when will I ever find one this good again”; dessert ordered at the end of the meal out of temptation, despite already feeling full; the ice-cold carbonated drink or granita, because “it really is a pleasure in this heat.” The result is always the same: a sensation of stomach heaviness that is difficult to tolerate and is often accompanied by pain, acidity, heartburn, abdominal bloating, belching, and all the other symptoms of poor digestion. Occasional stomach heaviness is not related to particular diseases or significant health problems, but almost always to consuming excessive and/or difficult-to-digest foods, which require the gastric mucosa to secrete, in a short time, an amount of gastric juices greater than its capacity and require the liver, gallbladder, and pancreas to rapidly release enzymes to support the complete digestion and absorption of the fats, proteins, and carbohydrates consumed during the meal. [13–18]
Conversely, if the symptoms of poor digestion tend to recur frequently or even after every meal, including meals that are not particularly large, the underlying cause of the discomfort may be:
functional dyspepsia (also aggravated by anxiety and stress)
irritable bowel syndrome or chronic inflammatory bowel disease
allergies or intolerances to particular foods
alterations in liver function, obstruction of the bile ducts or, more rarely, chronic pancreatitis.
If, on the other hand, in addition to heaviness, abdominal bloating, and mild nausea, there are also (or predominantly) acidity, heartburn, acid reflux, cramps, and stomach pain, the cause may be gastritis, gastric ulcer, hiatal hernia or, in a very small minority of cases, a stomach tumor.
Note [D] Green tea.
1) Rich in anti-inflammatory polyphenols
Green tea contains high amounts of catechins, particularly EGCG (epigallocatechin gallate), one of the most studied natural antioxidants. [19]
These molecules help to:
Inhibit pro-inflammatory enzymes
Reduce the production of inflammatory cytokines
Positively modulate the immune response
Result: less activation of the processes that maintain inflammation over time.
2) Strong antioxidant action
Chronic inflammation is closely linked to oxidative stress (excess free radicals).
Green tea helps to:
Neutralize free radicals
Protect cell membranes
Protect DNA from oxidative damage
This helps interrupt the vicious circle between oxidation and inflammation.
3) Positive influence on metabolic pathways
Regular consumption of green tea is associated with: [19]
Improved insulin sensitivity
Reduction of inflammatory markers in the blood
Support for fat metabolism
Since obesity and inflammation are strongly correlated, this effect is particularly important.
4) Benefits for the gut microbiota
Green tea promotes the growth of “good” intestinal bacteria and limits potentially harmful ones.
A balanced microbiota:
Reduces intestinal permeability
Limits the passage of toxins into the blood
Lowers activation of the immune system
All of this contributes to reducing systemic inflammation.
❤️ 5) Cardiovascular protection
Low-grade chronic inflammation is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk and may contribute to atherosclerotic mechanisms. [1]
Green tea:
Improves endothelial function
Reduces oxidation of LDL cholesterol
Helps maintain arterial elasticity
Contributing to a less inflamed vascular environment.
☕ How much green tea should be consumed?
Studies and nutritional recommendations frequently consider amounts in the range of 2–3 cups per day; however, effects may vary among individuals; preferably without sugar and away from main meals if one has anemia (it can reduce iron absorption). [19]
Note at the end of the article
For some factors, such as food additives, numerous studies suggest an association between intake and possible negative health effects. These findings must nevertheless be interpreted in the context of the research methods used, which often include observational studies, experimental models, or numerically limited samples. A result obtained in an animal model does not automatically demonstrate that the same effect occurs in humans; however, it may represent a biological signal that should not be ignored, especially when reducing exposure entails minimal cost or risk. Long-term clinical studies in humans, particularly for chronic exposure to individual ingredients or mixtures of additives, are often complex, expensive, and difficult to conduct. Moreover, economic incentives to fund large studies are generally greater when there is a product or intervention to develop than for research aimed simply at establishing whether it is advisable to reduce or avoid a substance already on the market. In this approach, such evidence is therefore considered sufficient to adopt a precautionary principle, even in the absence of definitive causal proof. The absence of definitive proof of harm in humans should not, in fact, be confused with proof of absolute harmlessness.
Essential bibliography
Low-grade chronic inflammation (LGCI) and cardio-metabolic risk
[1] Low-grade inflammation as a risk factor for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes — Sharif S, et al. (2021). Cardiovascular Diabetology. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-021-01409-0. (PubMed)
“Western” diet, intestinal permeability, and dysbiosis
[2] Western diet components that increase intestinal permeability with implications on health — Jaquez-Durán G, Arellano-Ortiz AL. (2024). Int J Vitam Nutr Res. DOI: 10.1024/0300-9831/a000801. (PubMed)
Stress → intestinal permeability (CRF, mast cells) and the gut–brain axis
[3] Psychological stress and corticotropin-releasing hormone increase intestinal permeability in humans by a mast cell-dependent mechanism — Vanuytsel T, et al. (2014). Gut. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305690. (PubMed)
[4] CRF induces intestinal epithelial barrier injury via the release of mast cell proteases and TNF-α — Overman EL, et al. (2012). PLOS ONE. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039935. (Semantic Scholar)
[5] Role of corticotropin-releasing factor in gastrointestinal permeability (review/overview useful for linking the pieces) — Rodiño-Janeiro BK, et al. (2015). J Neurogastroenterology and Motility. DOI: 10.5056/jnm14084. (jnmjournal.org)
Physical activity and reduction of inflammatory markers
[6] Effect of exercise training on C reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials — Fedewa MV, Hathaway ED, Ward-Ritacco CL. (2017). Br J Sports Med. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-095999. (PubMed)
[7] Effect of exercise training on chronic inflammation (review) — Beavers KM, Brinkley TE, Nicklas BJ. (2010). Aging and Disease (PMC). (Excellent as a general framework “lifestyle → inflammation”). (PMC)
Mediterranean diet and inflammatory biomarkers
[8] Mediterranean Diet Reduces Inflammation in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials — Keshani M, et al. (2025). Nutrition Reviews. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaf213. (OUP Academic)
[9] Reyneke GL, Lambert K, Beck EJ. Dietary Patterns Associated With Anti-inflammatory Effects: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Nutrition Reviews. 2026;84(6):1167–1192. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaf104.
[10] Pourrajab B, Fotros D, Asghari P, Shidfar F. Effect of the Mediterranean diet supplemented with olive oil versus the low-fat diet on serum inflammatory and endothelial indexes among adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical controlled trials. Nutrition Reviews. 2025;83:e1421–e1440. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae166.
Ultra-processed foods and inflammation (CRP/hs-CRP, etc.)
[11] Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers: A Scoping Review — Ciaffi J, et al. (2025). Nutrients. DOI: 10.3390/nu17183012. (PubMed)
Pollution, oxidative stress, and systemic inflammation
[12] Particulate air pollution, systemic oxidative stress, inflammation, and atherosclerosis — Araujo JA, Nel AE. (2010). Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health. DOI: 10.1007/s11869-010-0101-8. (PMC)
“Sugars + proteins,” gut hormones, and gastric emptying
[13] Ghrelin, CCK, GLP-1, and PYY(3–36): Secretory Controls and Physiological Roles in Eating and Glycemia in Health, Obesity, and After RYGB — Steinert RE, Feinle-Bisset C, et al. (2017). Physiological Reviews. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00031.2014. (Physiology journals)
[14] Effects of a Protein Preload on Gastric Emptying, Glycemia, and Gut Hormones After a Carbohydrate Meal in Diet-Controlled Type 2 Diabetes — Ma J, Stevens JE, et al. (2009). Diabetes Care (PMC). (Experimental study: proteins → ↑CCK/GLP-1 and slowed emptying). (PMC)
[15] Effects of GLP-1 and Its Analogs on Gastric Physiology in Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity — Maselli DB, Camilleri M. (2021). DOI: 10.1007/5584_2020_496. (Semantic Scholar)
[16] Evaluation of interactions between CCK and GLP-1 in their effects on appetite and gut function — Brennan IM, et al. (2005). Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00732.2004. (Physiology journals)
“Dessert stomach” and sensory-specific satiety
[17] Sensory specific satiety in man — Rolls BJ, Rolls ET, Rowe EA, Sweeney K. (1981). Physiology & Behavior. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(81)90310-3. (PubMed)
[18] Sensory-specific satiety (brief/classic review) — Rolls BJ. (1986). Nutrition Reviews. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1986.tb07593.x. (PubMed)
[19] Dehzad MJ, Ghalandari H, Nouri M, Makhtoomi M, Askarpour M. Effects of green tea supplementation on antioxidant status and inflammatory markers in adults: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Journal of Nutritional Science. 2025;14:e25. DOI: 10.1017/jns.2025.13.
Diet, microbiota, and inflammation – analysis of Italian media coverage (2025–2026). (Published separately)
Continued → Integrated approach to reducing low-grade chronic inflammation in light of 2026 scientific research